4.3 Monotone Sequences
So far, in all the examples of sequences we have seen so far we have had to know what the limit of the sequence is in order to prove the existence of it, but sometimes this is tricky to know beforehand if we are dealing with a novel sequence. We will now introduce some tools and theorems that will enable us to prove the existence of a limit for a sequence without knowing what the limit is.
Definition 4.3.
Let be a sequence of real numbers.
-
•
is increasing if
-
•
is decreasing if
-
•
is monotone if it is either increasing or decreasing.
Example 4.8.
Here are some examples of sequences with their characterisation by this definition.
-
•
is increasing.
-
•
is decreasing.
-
•
is both increasing and decreasing.
-
•
is decreasing.
-
•
is not monotone.
-
•
is not monotone.
4.3.1 The Monotone Convergence Theorem
We can make an important observation from these examples. Of the bounded sequences in the previous example (, , , ), the ones which are also monotone (just and ) are all convergent, whereas none of the unbounded sequences are convergent (which we would expect by theorem 4.3). Although a sequence does not have to be monotone to converge (look at the last example above), it is a general result that if a monotone sequence is bounded then it does converge, which we will now prove.
Theorem 4.5 (Monotone Convergence Theorem (MCT))
Let be a monotone sequence. Then is convergent if and only if is bounded.
Proof.
(Forward direction ): This follows from theorem 4.3.
(Reverse direction ): Suppose is bounded and without meaningful loss of generality assume is increasing. Recall that since is complete, every bounded set of real numbers has a supremum that is also a real number, i.e. if we let
(4.32) |
then is a bounded subset of the real numbers and we can let . Now we want to show that converges to . Let and note that is not an upper bound since is the supremum. Therefore, there exists such that . Now since is increasing, for we have
(4.33) |
and hence as . ∎
This theorem makes intuitive sense, if we have a sequence which is always increasing or decreasing and is bounded then it must reach a limit before it surpasses the bound, and in fact this limit is the least upper/greatest lower bound of the set of elements of the sequence.
Corollary 4.5.1
Suppose is a bounded sequence, then
-
(i)
If is increasing, .
-
(ii)
If is decreasing, .
Proof.
The proof follows directly from the proof of MCT. ∎
Example 4.9.
Let be a sequence given by
(4.34) |
Show that this sequence is convergent.
First notice that is increasing,
(4.35) |
and also the elements of are bounded between 0 and 2.
(4.36) | ||||
(4.37) | ||||
(4.38) | ||||
(4.39) |
Hence by MCT, this sequence must converge. In fact, it can be shown that this sequence converges to , but the proof of that is a bit more involved.