4.2 Properties of Limits
Now that we have established how to prove the existence of limits, we will consider the uniqueness of them, as well as some algebraic properties of convergent sequences.
Theorem 4.2
If a sequence converges, its limit is unique.
Proof.
Let be a convergent sequence and suppose that and . Let . Then there exists such that , but there also exists such that . Now,
(for ) | ||||
(4.14) | ||||
(4.15) |
Therefore, , so (since , ). Thus, the two limits are in fact the same. ∎
The next theorem will serve as a stepping stone that will make some more useful theorems much easier to prove. First, recall that a set is bounded if and only if it is bounded both above and below. We extend this definition to the elements of sequences, saying that a sequence is bounded if there exists such that . This is a very quick and easy way to establish the range of a sequence that will come in handy later.
Theorem 4.3
Every convergent sequence is bounded11 1 Note that the converse of this theorem is obviously not true, is bounded, but does not converge..
Proof.
Let be a convergent sequence with . Then there exists such that . Consider the terms in the sequence and let . Now, for all , (since ), which is a constant, hence is bounded. ∎
4.2.1 Adding and Multiplying Sequences
Now that we have this tool, we can proceed to some more interesting results about how limits of sequences behave when we add and multiply sequences together.
Theorem 4.4
Let , and converging sequences with and .
-
(i)
-
(ii)
-
(iii)
If and , then
-
(iv)
If and , then
-
(v)
-
(vi)
If , then .
Proof.
For all parts of this proof, begin by letting .
-
(i)
Since such that and since such that . Choose , now for we have
(4.16) (4.17) (4.18) -
(ii)
Since is bounded, such that . Since such that and since such that . Now, choosing , for we have
(4.19) (4.20) (4.21) (4.22) (4.23) -
(iii)
Since such that . Then for
(4.24) so . Now, let be such that , then for we have
(4.25) (4.26) -
(iv)
Write as , then the result follows from parts (ii) and (iii).
-
(v)
Let (so is the constant sequence with limit ), then the result follows from part (ii).
-
(vi)
We will make use of a minor result to assist in proving this.
Lemma
Suppose is a convergent sequence with . If then .
Proof.
Suppose by way of contradiction that and let . Then since converges, such that . This means that
(4.27) (4.28) (4.29) which is a contradiction, hence must be greater than 0. ∎
Now, consider . The sequence converges to by part (i) (and part (v) with ) and so by our claim , which implies as required.
∎
4.2.2 Sandwich Principle
A little observation from the last part of this theorem is the sandwich principle, which is that if we have three sequences — , and with limits , and respectively — with , then . In the special case that , we can use this principle to determine the limit of an unknown sequence as in this case . We will finish off this section with a couple of examples about how to use the arithmetic properties of limits.
Example 4.6.
Example 4.7.
Show that the sequence converges to 2.
(4.31) |